Department of
State
Washington,
D.C.
20520
CONFIDENTIAL
March 29, 1971
MEMORANDUM FOR NEA - Mr. Sisco
THRU NEA - Mr. Van Hollen
FROM NEA/INC -
David T. Schneider
SUBJECT Indian Reaction to Pakistan Events
INDIAN ACTIONS THUS FAR
Embassy Delhi reports that
Mrs. Gandhi has agreed to discuss with opposition leaders a resolution to be
presented in the Parliament March 30, offering support to the "freedom
struggle" of the people of East Pakistan.
Swaran Singh made a statement before the
Parliament on March 27 that the GOI was "gravely concerned" at events
in East Pakistan. He said India was prepared
with other nations and international organizations to provide humanitarian
relief to the victims of the conflict.
Mrs. Gandhi, on the same day, spoke of the "deep agony" of the
Parliament, and said that the GOI had looked forward to the peaceful transfer
of power in Pakistan to the people's
democratically elected representatives in anticipation of improved IndiaPakistan relations. She
said, however, that in the current situation the GOI had to observe certain
international norms and, therefore, the less the government said, the better.
Ambassador Keating was called in to see Foreign Secretary Kaul March 27. Kaul said an
unusually large influx of refugees was expected and asked for our ideas about coping with
refugee problem. He expressed the hope there would not be outside intervention in East Pakistan and mentioned
rumors of possible Chinese assistance to the GOP. He asked if we would exchange
information we may have on the situation in East Pakistan with the GOI.
TENTATIVE ESTIMATE OF INDIAN FUTURE
POSTURE
Initially, the Indians are likely to
confine their actions to expressions of sympathy for and perhaps
support to East Bengalis. They will watch closely for signs as to
the strength
and prospects for success on the part of East Bengal dissidents.
If the evidence indicates to the Indians that the East Bengal independence movement has
reasonably good prospects for success, the GOI may do any of several things:
a. Tolerate privately provided cross-border assistance to
the East Bengalis ; This assistance could range from
propaganda support to weapons and explosives.
b. Permit East Bengal dissidents to use
India as a refuge and
to conduct crossborder activities from within
India.
c. Covertly provide supplies, including
weapons, and perhaps some training, to East Bengal dissidents.
The GOI is likely to be cautious about recognition but is likely to
recognize when and if it believes the East Bengalis control a
substantial part of East Bengal and will be successful in
achieving control of all of it. After recognition Indian assistance efforts would be more likely and more
extensive.
India seems unlikely
to intervene in East Bengal with its own military forces. However, if it
pursues the course indicated above, clashes between Indian and Pakistani military
along the India-Pakistan border are a distinct possibility. These would take
place when Pakistani forces attempt to prevent cross-border activities in support of East Bengal dissidents.
Whether or not the Indians take any of the above steps will depend upon
their estimate of how
strong the East
Bengal
movement is.
The above estimate is based upon our view that the GOI is changing its
opinion regarding Indian interest in continued Pakistan unity. So long as
there was a good prospect for a democratic Pakistan in which East Bengal was the
predominant force, India strongly favored
a unified Pakistan. However, we
doubt the GOI would favor a unified Pakistan in which the West
was predominant and the army and Bhutto dominated the West. The army and Bhutto
are blamed for Pakistan's confrontation policy and the
1965 war.
NEA/INC : DTSchneider: ges