Telegram From the Department of State
to the Embassy in Pakistan/1/
Washington,
April 17, 1971, 2102Z.
/1/ Source: National Archives, RG 59, Central Files 1970-73, POL 15 PAK.
Confidential. Drafted and approved by Van Hollen and cleared by Spengler (NEA/PAF).
Also sent to London and Dacca
and repeated to New Delhi, Calcutta,
Bombay, Lahore,
and Karachi.
65773. Subject: Provisional Government of Bangla Desh.
1. Pakistan
Ambassador Hilaly told Van Hollen on instructions April 16 that Government of
Pakistan wished to bring to USG's attention possible approach by
representatives alleging to represent "Provisional Government of Bangla
Desh."
2. Hilaly said India
had permitted establishment provisional government on its territory and was
providing financial support. In GOP view, such provisional government exists
only in GOI's imagination, is designed to justify Indian intervention, and to
aggravate already serious situation.
3. Hilaly said GOP understands that several representatives of so-called
Provisional Government already have gone abroad to seek support. One such
representative, Zakaria Choudhury, has already arrived in London. According Reuter news report
London, April 15, he has held press conference and has
been interviewed on BBC, claiming that Bengali separatists control three
fourths of East Pakistan. Same news report
states that FCO has refused receive Choudhury.
4. Hilaly concluded by saying that it was probable that another
representative of Bangla Desh would come to Washington in effort see USG officials. In
anticipation of this possibility, he had been asked formally to advise USG that
GOP considered establishment of Provisional Government as essentially
Indian-sponsored action. Representatives of Bangla Desh, who have been charged
with treason, have no right to speak regarding Pakistan./2/
/2/ On April 13 a representative of the Awami League called on the
British Deputy High Commissioner in Calcutta and
indicated that "Bangla Desh Prime Minister" Tajuddin Ahmed wanted to
meet with U.S.
and British officials. (Telegram 641 from Calcutta,
April 13; ibid., POL 23-9 PAK) The Consulate General in Dacca confirmed that Ahmed was a key figure
in the Bengali resistance and would probably emerge as political head of the
resistance movement. (Telegram 1297 from Dacca,
April 14; ibid.) Although British officials agreed to meet with Ahmed, the
Department instructed the Consulate in Calcutta
to decline to do the same. The Department felt that such a meeting arranged
through the British raised questions about the organization Ahmed represented
and could have implications regarding recognition of a government of Bangla
Desh. The Department did not preclude, however, future meetings with Ahmed or
other representatives of the Awami League. (Telegram 62715 to
Calcutta, April 14; ibid)
5. For London:
Would appreciate any information re activities Zakaria Choudhury, including any
efforts he may have made to approach FCO.
6. For Dacca:
Do you have any data on Choudhury?
Samuels