SUHRAWARDY'S DEATH WAS NOT NATURAL

 

It could be yet another case of ` political murder', says Mujib

 

Sheikh Mujibur Rahman yesterday raised the question of the circumstances of the death of Mr. H. S. Suhrawardy in a Beirut hotel.

 

The Awami League President said he had received a letter from the former Prime Minister from Beirut in which he had very clearly written that he was absolutely healthy and planned to return to Pakistan in about four days.

 

The most trusted lieutenant of Mr. Suhrawardy said he failed to co-relate the events of the telephone operator passing the call to the Pakistani leader, his picking up of the telephone and then dropping it down; at the same time the reasoning of the telephone operator finding the key to the room and entering there to find him dead.

 

"How could one say that the death of Mr. Suhrawardy was not ill unnatural circumstances?" he asked. "In any case it will he looked into when the proper time comes " he asserted. It could be yet another case of "political murder " in the country.

 

The Awami League chief was speaking at a seminar on the " Life and Achievements of Mr. Suhrawardy " held last evening at Beach Luxury Hotel under the auspices of the Suhrawardy Academy.

 

The other speakers were Begum Akhtar Sulaiman, daughter of the late Prime Minister; Begum Shasista lkramullah, member of the first Constituent Assembly of Pakistan; Mr. G. M. Syed, President of the Sind United Front; Mr. Ghulam Faruque, a former Governor of East Pakistan; Mr. Ahmad Jaffar, member of tile first Constituent Assembly of Pakistan; Dr. Kemal Husain, and Mr. Khalil Ahmad Tirmazi.

 

Victim of conspiracies

 

Mr. Mujibur Rahman said that Mr. Suhrawardy became " a victim of conspiracies right from the day Pakistan came into being ". In the first instance, he said, in spite of being the Chief Minister of United Bengal, he was denied the opportunity to become the Chief Minister of East Pakistan.

 

In contrast, Nawab Mamdot who was the Chief Minister of United Punjab became the Chief Minister of West Punjab after the partition, he said.

The different treatment, he said, was in spite of the fact that both cases Were identical in as Much as both leaders had been originally elected from constituencies which became part of India after the partition.

 

Besides, he said, Mr. Suhrawardy was also deprived of his membership of the first Constituent Assembly of Pakistan.

 

The Awami League Chief said that one of the biggest contributions to democracy in Pakistan was made by Mr. Suhrawardy in as much as he set up the first organised Opposition in the National Assembly as well as the country.

This was important because it was impossible to conceive or democracy without an organised opposition.

 

He said that Mr. Suhrawardy's personality was outstanding in countless manners. He was a lawyer whose monthly income in 1944 in Calcutta was about Rs. 25,000. Yet he died as a pauper.

 

Second to Quaid

 

He said the Quaid-i-Azam rendered greatest scarifices for the Muslim nation, and Mr. Suhrawardy was only next to the Father of the Nation in this respect.

 

He said Mr. Suhrawardy was a man of character, integrity and great intellect. He was also a man of the masses and could never compromise on principles. For these very reasons, he said, his adversaries were most afraid of him. They were also afraid of his workers and did not spare any efforts to destroy them, either.

 

Mr. Mujibur Rahman said " we happened to be the unfortunate people of a fortunate country in which due respect and regard was not shown to men like Mr. Suhrawardy who felt for the people and had the welfare of the country at their heart."

 

He said Mr. Suhrawardy was a great philanthropist and was never found lacking in helping his friends and associates.

 

In this connection he said that he knew personally that Mr. Suhrawardy spent Rs. 3,500 per month in helping his old workers and friends.

 

Great Freedom Fighter

 

He said that the great freedom fighter died in the quest of justice, rule of the common man, and to undo the wrongs which had led the country to this situation.

 

As for his love for the Indian Muslims, he said, Mr. Suhrawardy did what none else in this country could do. After the partition, Mr. Suhrawardy stayed on India because he felt passionately for them.

 

He was offered ministership but preferred the responsibility of ensuring peace for the Indian Muslims.

 

To serve the Indian Muslims he toured Bihar, Alwar, Bharatpur, Delhi and East Punjab-at the risk of his life-so that they could be spared of the massacre at the hands of the Hindu communalists.

 

Mr. Subrawardy did all this because lie was fully convinced that the Muslims of the minority provinces of India were the real architects of Pakistan and had rendered tremendous sacrifices so that the Muslims of the sub-continent could have a homeland of their own. They stayed back in India to suffer so that we could hold high the banner of Islam in this newly born State, he said.

 

Sheikh Sahib said that Mr. Suhrawardy got the biggest shock of his life when he was jailed by the Ayub regime in Karachi. The Ayub regime also refused him money for treatment abroad.

 

He said it was "improper" to say that Shaheed Suhrawardy was dead; he would never die; he would always remain alive, he emphasised.

 

He said that Mr. Suhrawardy was fully in agreement with him on the question of provincial autonomy. He added that he had exchanged views with him on this subject on several occasions and declared that the Six-point Programme of the Awami League truly reflected the thinking of the former Prime Minister in building up a strong and united nation.

 

He said his homage to "my leader" was in the firm belief that the Awami League would never deter from its course of serving the people, its determination to refuse to Surrender to conspiracies, intrigues and political bribery.

 

He cautioned that the conspirators who had been active since the establishment of Pakistan were working to frustrate the attempts of the nation to go to the polls. He affirmed that their attempts would be frustrated. East Pakistanis shall never allow them to do it, he warned.

 

(THE DAWN, Karachi-June 30, 1970)

 

 

Source: Bangladesh Documents, vol-I, p.85-87