Memorandum
from the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger) to
President Nixon/1/
/1/
Source: National Archives, Nixon Presidential Materials, NSC Files, Box 37,
President's Daily Briefs, Dec 1-Dec 16, 1971. Top Secret;
Sensitive; Codeword. A stamp on the memorandum indicates that the
President saw it.
Washington, December 2, 1971.
SUBJECT
Information Items
India-Pakistan
Situation: The latest reports seem to indicate that the Indian and guerrilla
offensive along the East Pakistan border is gaining some momentum. The disparity in manpower
and supplies apparently is taking its toll on the Pak forces and they
reportedly have abandoned a number of contested locations in the face of
relentless pressure in the direction of several major provincial cities.
Meanwhile, there are indications that the situation is starting to deteriorate
in the interior where the guerrilla forces are operating more freely now that
most of the Pak forces have been drawn off to defend the frontiers. Some towns
as close as 17 miles from Dacca reportedly have been abandoned to the guerrillas and there
are reports of the Bangla Desh
flag flying in a number of towns elsewhere in the interior. The Indians have
also set up a "Mukti Bahini
navy" with their own forces with the priority objective of blocking
shipping into East Pakistan.
At the
UN the situation is relatively static for the moment. The Japanese and Belgians
are standing down their efforts to create interest in a Security Council
meeting after having received no encouragement from the permanent
representatives. For the moment the Soviets and Indians are getting their
way-inaction-but the Pak ambassador at the UN thinks that it is possible that
he could have instructions to move for a Security Council meeting as early as
Friday./2/ He also reports that the Chinese have promised to use their veto if
the Paks ask them. It is assumed that the Soviets are
prepared to do the same for India.
/2/ December 3.
Our China watchers in Hong
Kong report that the attention of
Chinese media to the Indo-Pak crisis has risen sharply in the last ten days.
The coverage has featured descriptions of India's actions as an "invasion" and as military
"provocations" and there has been one high level reference to
"armed aggression." Direct charges of Soviet involvement have also
rather abruptly become a significant feature. At the same time the Chinese have
not tried to play up any threat to their own security.
Chinese public pledges of support to the Pakistanis have remained generalized
and at least once they have indirectly implied that the Paks
do not need assistance. They have also continued to call for peaceful
"consultations" between India and Pakistan.
We have
an initial reaction from the Indian Government on our cutoff of military
supplies. Foreign Secretary Kaul took the
announcement of our new military supply policy toward India in reasonably good grace, indicating that the U.S. had the right to do whatever it thought best.
In a friendly and earnest way he warned Ambassador Keating that no country
should think they could persuade India to alter the path on which it was embarked through
pressure tactics. Kaul urged that the U.S. not forget the common values and common ideals we both
share.
[Omitted
here are summary reports on foreign policy issues unrelated to South Asia.]
Source: Document 214, volume XI, South
Asia crisis 1971, Department of State.